How sound quality shapes authority in corporate communication

By NCS Staff November 26, 2025

Subscribe to NCS for the latest news, project case studies and product announcements in broadcast technology, creative design and engineering delivered to your inbox.

When viewers tune in to a corporate town hall, investor webcast or internal announcement, they often judge credibility long before they absorb the message itself. It is not just what executives say that matters — it’s how they sound.

Audio quality has a direct impact on how information is received and retained.

When sound is clear, consistent and free of distraction, audiences focus on the message. When it is muffled or distorted, attention drifts and authority fades.

“Any distortion, background noise or drop in audio focus can pull attention away from the message,” said Robb Blumenreder, insights manager, Pro Audio at Sennheiser in Part Three of the Guide to Corporate Production from NCS. “It takes the brain time to reengage. That’s where poor audio does real damage — it disrupts focus and makes the speaker seem less assured.”

The psychology of listening

In consumer media, audiences often tolerate imperfections for content they seek — a live concert clip or podcast recorded on the fly. Corporate communication is different. Viewers are not voluntarily pressing play; they are asked to listen.

“If you’re watching your favorite band, you’ll put up with a bad recording because you want to hear the music,” Blumenreder said. “But if you’re watching a CEO or subject-matter expert deliver information, you expect it to sound professional. Any glitch or noise can make that person seem less credible.”

In corporate studios, this connection between audio and authority is driving new investment.

Executives increasingly understand that quality sound does more than improve clarity — it reinforces brand perception. A well-produced presentation suggests competence, preparation and trustworthiness.

Advertisement

When video looks good but sounds wrong

Blumenreder frequently sees production teams devote significant time to lighting, camera selection and visual composition while treating audio as an afterthought.

“You can go to a trade show like NAB and see people spend hundreds of thousands on lenses and lighting,” he said. “Then audio is the last thing they think about. But as soon as there’s a glitch in sound, concentration breaks.”

Microphone placement, he noted, is among the most overlooked details in video production.

“A shotgun microphone isn’t a laser beam — it won’t isolate someone 15 feet away. An inch of placement can change the tone completely.”

For corporate facilities designed to look broadcast-ready, the most visible part of the setup is often the least audible one. Without thoughtful microphone strategy and signal management, even the best acoustic environment can fail to deliver the clarity audiences expect.

The myth of “good enough”

The accessibility of mobile devices and consumer-grade wireless systems has blurred the line between professional and amateur capture.

Blumenreder describes a common pattern: “Teams start with a phone and think it sounds fine. Then they add an inexpensive wireless kit. Eventually, they realize that reliable, high-quality capture requires purpose-built tools. By that point, they’ve already had on-air failures.”

That evolution, from improvised to intentional, mirrors a larger trend in corporate media.

As organizations invest in multiuse studios and recurring video content, expectations for quality rise. Audiences accustomed to broadcast standards now expect the same polish from corporate messaging.

Blumenreder divides most corporate audio environments into three tiers:

Entry level
Hybrid workspaces or small studios often rely on camera-mounted microphones such as Sennheiser’s MKE 400 or MKE 600. These deliver focused, directional sound for short distances but are best suited to one-person recordings or interview setups with minimal movement.

Mid level
Facilities that handle board discussions or multi-presenter streams benefit from digital UHF wireless systems like EW-DX, which provide clean, low-latency performance even in congested Wi-Fi environments. “That’s where most enterprise setups are today — multiple mics, network monitoring and reliable channel coordination,” he said.

Advertisement

High level
Event and broadcast-scale productions — such as product launches or executive keynotes — require fully networked, bi-directional systems such as Sennheiser’s Digital 6000 or Spectra series. These solutions provide both a lavalier and in-ear monitor feed from a single bodypack.

“At that level, reliability isn’t optional,” Blumenreder said. “You’re dealing with million-dollar presenters. Every second of downtime costs money.”

Beyond the microphone

Modern corporate audio extends well beyond microphones and transmitters. Increasingly, studios use networked audio standards like Dante (covered in Part One of the Guide to Corporate Production) or MADI to route and manage signals across control rooms, streaming encoders and automation systems.

“A lot of people think they’re just buying a wireless system, but they’re also joining a network,” Blumenreder said. “You need to understand how Dante interacts with video workflows, latency offsets and IP infrastructure. Today’s audio engineer also needs to be a networking expert.”

That convergence is reshaping control-room design.

Audio now shares the same data backbone as video switching, monitoring and remote contribution. Corporate engineers adopting IP-based production see this as an opportunity to unify control and improve reliability—provided they plan for synchronization and bandwidth.

For enterprise operations, dependability often outweighs specification. In broadcast environments, even a momentary dropout is unacceptable; corporate stakeholders expect the same.

“There are hundreds of audio brands out there now,” Blumenreder said. “But when you have an executive on stage and something fails, you want to be able to call someone and get help. That’s part of what you pay for — support, service and standards.”

“When executives use professional tools, they carry themselves differently,” he said. “It affects confidence and delivery.”

The broadcast mindset

For companies new to production, adopting a broadcast approach to audio can seem daunting. But the core principles — clean capture, redundancy, monitoring and consistent levels — apply at any scale.

Advertisement

“Audio first is a good rule,” Blumenreder said. “If the sound is right, you can work around the visuals. But if the sound fails, you’ve lost your audience.”

Ultimately, high-quality audio is not about perfection; it is about perception. In a professional setting, clarity signals competence.

“You can’t fix bad audio in post if you’re live,” he said. “When people hear you clearly, they trust you more.”

Selecting the technology for your corporate video studio

Part Three of Professional Essentials: Guide to Corporate Production explores how to evaluate, implement and maintain the technology that powers modern corporate video. This edition provides practical guidance on building production control rooms that match your workflow, selecting cameras and gear fit your strategy, designing resilient IP-based networks and integrating cloud tools for flexibility and collaboration.

Download Now
Selecting the technology for your corporate video studio cover

Subscribe to NCS for the latest news, project case studies and product announcements in broadcast technology, creative design and engineering delivered to your inbox.